| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfDDGxdhP0-yKOCJyJ_+Y2Zu3TmOdvUJmEZ0AvQnceV6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Srikanth Krishnakar <skrishnakar@...il.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform/x86: simatic-ipc: add main driver for
Siemens devices
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:36 AM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
>
> This mainly implements detection of these devices and will allow
> secondary drivers to work on such machines.
>
> The identification is DMI-based with a vendor specific way to tell them
> apart in a reliable way.
>
> Drivers for LEDs and Watchdogs will follow to make use of that platform
> detection.
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
The order is wrong taking into account the From line in the body. So,
it's not clear who is the author, who is a co-developer, and who is
the committer (one person may utilize few roles).
Check for the rest of the series as well (basically this is the rule
of thumb to recheck entire code for the comment you have got at any
single place of it).
...
> +config SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC
> + tristate "Siemens Simatic IPC Class driver"
> + depends on PCI
> + help
> + This Simatic IPC class driver is the central of several drivers. It
> + is mainly used for system identification, after which drivers in other
> + classes will take care of driving specifics of those machines.
> + i.e. leds and watchdogs
LEDs
watchdog. (missed period and singular form)
Module name?
> endif # X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES
Not sure about the ordering of the section in Kconfig, but it is up to
maintainers.
...
> +# Siemens Simatic Industrial PCs
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC) += simatic-ipc.o
Ditto.
...
> + * Siemens SIMATIC IPC driver for LEDs
It seems to be used in patch 4 which is not LED related. Also, why is
it here if it's for LEDs?
...
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
Replace with SPDX
...
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
Ordered?
> +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/simatic-ipc.h>
...
> +static int register_platform_devices(u32 station_id)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u8 ledmode = SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE;
> + u8 wdtmode = SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE;
Reversed xmas tree order?
> + platform_data.devmode = SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(device_modes); i++) {
> + if (device_modes[i].station_id == station_id) {
> + ledmode = device_modes[i].led_mode;
> + wdtmode = device_modes[i].wdt_mode;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (ledmode != SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE) {
> + platform_data.devmode = ledmode;
> + ipc_led_platform_device = platform_device_register_data
> + (NULL, KBUILD_MODNAME "_leds", PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> + &platform_data, sizeof(struct simatic_ipc_platform));
Strange indentation (second line).
> + if (IS_ERR(ipc_led_platform_device))
> + return PTR_ERR(ipc_led_platform_device);
> + pr_debug(KBUILD_MODNAME ": device=%s created\n",
> + ipc_led_platform_device->name);
Utilize pr_fmt() instead of adding prefixes like this.
> + }
> + if (wdtmode != SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE) {
> + platform_data.devmode = wdtmode;
> + ipc_wdt_platform_device = platform_device_register_data
> + (NULL, KBUILD_MODNAME "_wdt", PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> + &platform_data, sizeof(struct simatic_ipc_platform));
> + if (IS_ERR(ipc_wdt_platform_device))
> + return PTR_ERR(ipc_wdt_platform_device);
> +
> + pr_debug(KBUILD_MODNAME ": device=%s created\n",
> + ipc_wdt_platform_device->name);
> + }
Same comments as above.
> + if (ledmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE &&
> + wdtmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE) {
> + pr_warn(KBUILD_MODNAME
> + ": unsupported IPC detected, station id=%08x\n",
> + station_id);
Ugly indentation. With pr_fmt() in use will be much better.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
Redundant.
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
...
> +/*
> + * Get membase address from PCI, used in leds and wdt modul. Here we read
> + * the bar0. The final address calculation is done in the appropriate modules
bar -> BAR
Missed period.
> + */
> +
Unneeded blank line.
> +u32 simatic_ipc_get_membase0(unsigned int p2sb)
> +{
> + u32 bar0 = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
It's ugly besides the fact that you have a dependency.
> + struct pci_bus *bus;
Missed blank line.
> + /*
> + * The GPIO memory is bar0 of the hidden P2SB device. Unhide the device
> + * to have a quick look at it, before we hide it again.
> + * Also grab the pci rescan lock so that device does not get discovered
> + * and remapped while it is visible.
> + * This code is inspired by drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> + */
> + bus = pci_find_bus(0, 0);
> + pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> + pci_bus_write_config_byte(bus, p2sb, 0xE1, 0x0);
> + pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, p2sb, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, &bar0);
> +
> + bar0 &= ~0xf;
> + pci_bus_write_config_byte(bus, p2sb, 0xE1, 0x1);
> + pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
> + return bar0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(simatic_ipc_get_membase0);
Oy vey! I know what this is and let's do it differently. I have some
(relatively old) patch series I can send you privately for testing.
...
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
Not needed when you have SPDX.
...
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
Wrong header. Should be types.h
...
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/simatic-ipc-base.h>
Missed headers. You need to include ones that the code below is a
direct user of.
Like types.h
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists