linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rng: bcm2835: document reset support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6e5b3be7e2add03b8d00a931b7fe254cd39077e.camel@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 04 Mar 2021 13:07:36 +0100
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To:     Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Nícolas "F. R. A. Prado" 
        <nfraprado@...tonmail.com>,
        Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rng: bcm2835: document reset support

Hi Alvaro,

On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 18:00 +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Some devices may need to perform a reset before using the RNG, such as the
> BCM6368.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
> ---
>  v3: make resets required if brcm,bcm6368-rng.
>  v2: document reset support.
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
> index c147900f9041..11c23e1f6988 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
> @@ -37,6 +37,21 @@ required:
>  
> 
>  additionalProperties: false

I can't claim I fully understand all the meta stuff in shemas, so I generally
just follow the patterns already available out there. That said, shoudln't this
be at the end, just before the examples? Maybe the cause of that odd warning
you got there?

> +if:
> +  properties:
> +    compatible:
> +      enum:
> +        - brcm,bcm6368-rng
> +then:
> +  properties:
> +    resets:
> +      maxItems: 1
> +  required:
> +    - resets

I belive you can't really make a property required when the bindings for
'brcm,bcm6368-rng' were already defined. This will break the schema for those
otherwise correct devicetrees.

> +else:
> +  properties:
> +    resets: false
> +
>  examples:
>    - |
>      rng@...04000 {
> @@ -58,4 +73,6 @@ examples:
>  
> 
>          clocks = <&periph_clk 18>;
>          clock-names = "ipsec";
> +
> +        resets = <&periph_rst 4>;
>      };

Regards,
Nicolas


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)