[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22cf077f-02b2-2454-bc63-0c9327042ba5@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:16:10 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com, tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com,
gmazyland@...il.com, sashal@...nel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selinux: measure state and policy capabilities
On 3/4/21 5:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:20 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
> <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> On 2/12/21 8:37 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>>> SELinux stores the configuration state and the policy capabilities
>>> in kernel memory. Changes to this data at runtime would have an impact
>>> on the security guarantees provided by SELinux. Measuring this data
>>> through IMA subsystem provides a tamper-resistant way for
>>> an attestation service to remotely validate it at runtime.
>>>
>>> Measure the configuration state and policy capabilities by calling
>>> the IMA hook ima_measure_critical_data().
>>>
>>
>> I have addressed your comments on the v2 patch for selinux measurement
>> using IMA. Could you please let me know if there are any other comments
>> that I need to address in this patch?
>
> The merge window just closed earlier this week, and there were a
> handful of bugs that needed to be addressed before I could look at
> this patch. If I don't get a chance to review this patch tonight, I
> will try to get to it this weekend or early next week.
>
Thanks Paul.
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists