linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: charge before adding to swapcache on swapin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALvZod4iVF1tg8H-zcUVp6Kf+L9jeJBF62hNHuLNKrdcxyJXYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:42:00 -0800
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: charge before adding to swapcache on swapin

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:25 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
[...]
> I'd also rename cgroup_memory_noswap to cgroup_swapaccount - to match
> the commandline and (hopefully) make a bit clearer what it effects.

Do we really need to keep supporting "swapaccount=0"? Is swap
page_counter really a performance issue for systems with memcg and
swap? To me, deprecating "swapaccount=0" simplifies already
complicated code.