[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4e386f6-35f5-fdd7-10c9-c690615f1a47@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 19:23:18 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Use '0' as the one and only value
for an invalid PAE root
On 05/03/21 19:22, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 05/03/21 02:10, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Use '0' to denote an invalid pae_root instead of '0' or INVALID_PAGE.
>>> Unlike root_hpa, the pae_roots hold permission bits and thus are
>>> guaranteed to be non-zero. Having to deal with both values leads to
>>> bugs, e.g. failing to set back to INVALID_PAGE, warning on the wrong
>>> value, etc...
>>
>> I don't dispute this is a good idea, but it deserves one or more comments.
>
> Agreed. What about adding macros?
>
> /* Comment goes here. */
> #define INVALID_PAE_ROOT 0
> #define IS_VALID_PAE_ROOT(x) (!!(x))
Yep, that's a nice solution.
Paolo
>
>
> Also, I missed this pattern in mmu_audit.c's mmu_spte_walk():
>
> for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
> hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu->pae_root[i];
>
> if (root && VALID_PAGE(root)) {
> root &= PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
> sp = to_shadow_page(root);
> __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, 2);
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists