linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: Fix the recursive blkg rwstat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4cc104d1-9aa3-a838-b786-9a808dd85945@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:32:05 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: Fix the recursive blkg rwstat

On 3/5/21 1:13 AM, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> The current blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive doesn't
> work correctly.
> 
> As an example, for the following blkcg hierarchy:
>  (Made 1GB READ in test1, 512MB READ in test2)
>      test
>     /    \
>  test1   test2
> 
> $ head -n 1 test/test1/blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive
> 8:0 Read 1073684480
> $ head -n 1 test/test2/blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive
> 8:0 Read 537448448
> $ head -n 1 test/blkio.throttle.io_service_bytes_recursive
> 8:0 Read 537448448
> 
> Clearly, above data of "test" reflects "test2" not "test1"+"test2".
> 
> Do the correct summary in blkg_rwstat_recursive_sum().

LGTM, Tejun?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c b/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c
> index 85d5790..3304e84 100644
> --- a/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c
> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup-rwstat.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ void blkg_rwstat_recursive_sum(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, struct blkcg_policy *pol,
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&blkg->q->queue_lock);
>  
> +	memset(sum, 0, sizeof(*sum));
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	blkg_for_each_descendant_pre(pos_blkg, pos_css, blkg) {
>  		struct blkg_rwstat *rwstat;
> @@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ void blkg_rwstat_recursive_sum(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, struct blkcg_policy *pol,
>  			rwstat = (void *)pos_blkg + off;
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < BLKG_RWSTAT_NR; i++)
> -			sum->cnt[i] = blkg_rwstat_read_counter(rwstat, i);
> +			sum->cnt[i] += blkg_rwstat_read_counter(rwstat, i);
>  	}
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> 


-- 
Jens Axboe