linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 3/4] IIO: acpi-als: Get rid of ACPICA message printing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:42:29 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] IIO: acpi-als: Get rid of ACPICA message printing

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Use acpi_evaluation_failure_warn() introduced previously instead of
the ACPICA-specific ACPI_EXCEPTION() macro to log warning messages
regarding ACPI object evaluation failures and drop the
ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition only used by the ACPICA message
printing macro.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
@@ -26,8 +26,6 @@
 #define ACPI_ALS_DEVICE_NAME		"acpi-als"
 #define ACPI_ALS_NOTIFY_ILLUMINANCE	0x80
 
-ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi-als");
-
 /*
  * So far, there's only one channel in here, but the specification for
  * ACPI0008 says there can be more to what the block can report. Like
@@ -91,7 +89,7 @@ static int acpi_als_read_value(struct ac
 				       &temp_val);
 
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Error reading ALS %s", prop));
+		acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(als->device->handle, prop, status);
 		return -EIO;
 	}