[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <161497860915.24588.2102886207868627115.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 21:10:09 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: angkery <angkery@....com>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
drt@...ux.ibm.com, ljp@...ux.ibm.com, sukadev@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangjunlin@...ong.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ibmvnic: remove excessive irqsave
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:48:39 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Junlin Yang <yangjunlin@...ong.com>
>
> ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
>
> As reported by coccinelle, the second _irqsave() overwrites the value
> saved in 'flags' by the first _irqsave(), therefore when the second
> _irqrestore() comes,the value in 'flags' is not valid,the value saved
> by the first _irqsave() has been lost.
> This likely leads to IRQs remaining disabled. So remove the second
> _irqsave():
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
> spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v1] ibmvnic: remove excessive irqsave
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/69cdb7947adb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists