[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be0fdd57-507d-0f9b-89db-65891531908c@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:43:40 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Add bindings for
SN65DSI83/84/85
On 2/14/21 6:44 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> SN65DSI83/84/85 devices are MIPI DSI to LVDS based bridge
> controller IC's from Texas Instruments.
>
> SN65DSI83 - Single Channel DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> SN65DSI84 - Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge
> SN65DSI85 - Dual Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge
[...]
> +description: |
> + SN65DSI83/84/85 devices are MIPI DSI to LVDS based bridge controller
> + IC's from Texas Instruments.
> +
> + SN65DSI83 - Single Channel DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> + SN65DSI84 - Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge
> + SN65DSI85 - Dual Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge
[...]
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - ti,sn65dsi83
> + - ti,sn65dsi84
DSI85 seems missing ?
> + reg:
> + const: 0x2c
I have the DSI83 device at 0x2d, so this cannot be const 0x2c ?
> + enable-gpios:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: GPIO specifier for bridge enable pin (active high).
The bridge can work without this GPIO, so its optional.
[...]
Also, Doug reported that vcc and vcore regulators should likely be
listed, see feedback on:
[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 bindings
Powered by blists - more mailing lists