[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210305113212.66f8f965@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:32:12 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: rebase of the scsi-mkp tree
Hi James,
On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:21:20 -0800 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 11:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > I notice that you have rebased the scsi-mkp tree. Unfotunately James
> > has already merged part of the old version of the scsi-mkp tree int
> > the scsi tree so that commits f69d02e37a85..39ae3edda325 in the scsi-
> > mkp tree are the same patches as commits fe07bfda2fb9..100d21c4ff29
> > in the scsi tree.
>
> It's just the flux from Linus announcing he's screwed up -rc1 and we
> shouldn't base on it ... it should all be fixed soon.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists