[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67215668-0850-a0f3-06e1-49db590b8fcc@csgroup.eu>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 06:49:14 +0100
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: angkery <angkery@....com>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, drt@...ux.ibm.com,
ljp@...ux.ibm.com, sukadev@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Junlin Yang <yangjunlin@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvnic: remove excessive irqsave
Le 05/03/2021 à 02:43, angkery a écrit :
> From: Junlin Yang <yangjunlin@...ong.com>
>
> ibmvnic_remove locks multiple spinlocks while disabling interrupts:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
>
> there is no need for the second irqsave,since interrupts are disabled
> at that point, so remove the second irqsave:
The problème is not that there is no need. The problem is a lot more serious:
As reported by coccinella, the second _irqsave() overwrites the value saved in 'flags' by the first
_irqsave, therefore when the second _irqrestore comes, the value in 'flags' is not valid, the value
saved by the first _irqsave has been lost. This likely leads to IRQs remaining disabled, which is
_THE_ problem really.
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
> spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
>
> Generated by: ./scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
> ./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5413:1-18:
> ERROR: nested lock+irqsave that reuses flags from line 5404.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junlin Yang <yangjunlin@...ong.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index 2464c8a..a52668d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -5408,9 +5408,9 @@ static void ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
> * after setting state, so __ibmvnic_reset() which is called
> * from the flush_work() below, can make progress.
> */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
> adapter->state = VNIC_REMOVING;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->rwi_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&adapter->rwi_lock);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists