[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210305074417.GA123270@embeddedor>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 01:44:17 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] net: rose: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
letting the code fall through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
net/rose/rose_route.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
index 6e35703ff353..c0e04c261a15 100644
--- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ static int rose_del_node(struct rose_route_struct *rose_route,
case 1:
rose_node->neighbour[1] =
rose_node->neighbour[2];
+ break;
case 2:
break;
}
@@ -508,6 +509,7 @@ void rose_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
fallthrough;
case 1:
t->neighbour[1] = t->neighbour[2];
+ break;
case 2:
break;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists