[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEHs3CxWnusWklME@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:33:32 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] drivers: export device_is_bound()
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:18:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> CC Greg
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > Export the symbol for device_is_bound() so that we can use it in gpio-sim
> > to check if the simulated GPIO chip is bound before fetching its driver
> > data from configfs callbacks in order to retrieve the name of the GPIO
> > chip device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/dd.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > index 9179825ff646..c62c02e3490a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ bool device_is_bound(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > return dev->p && klist_node_attached(&dev->p->knode_driver);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_is_bound);
No. Please no. Why is this needed? Feels like someone is doing
something really wrong...
NACK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists