[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210305095508.GA7689@debian>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:25:10 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz,
joe.lawrence@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo in the file shadow-vars.rst
On 10:01 Fri 05 Mar 2021, Petr Mladek wrote:
>On Fri 2021-03-05 07:47:20, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>
>> s/ varibles/variables/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
>>
>> Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
>> variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may
>> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In
>> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In
>> these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
>> shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
>
>It might make sense to move the "In" to the next line. It sticks out
>even more now.
>
>Eitherway:
Thanks, your wish will get fulfilled in V2 ...will send your way :)
~Bhaskar
>Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
>Best Regards,
>Petr
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists