linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/16] rpmsg: glink: add sendto and trysendto ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:46:13 +0100
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/16] rpmsg: glink: add sendto and trysendto ops

Hi Mathieu,

On 3/4/21 8:11 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:14:53PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> Implement the sendto ops to support the future rpmsg_char update for the
>> vitio backend support.
> 
> Add a new line, otherwise it is very easy to read.
> 
>> The use of sendto in rpmsg_char is needed as a destination address is
>> requested at least by the virtio backend.
> 
> Same here and throughout the patchset.
> 
>> The glink implementation does not need a destination address so ignores it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
>> index d4e4dd482614..ae2c03b59c55 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
>> @@ -1332,6 +1332,20 @@ static int qcom_glink_trysend(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
>>  	return __qcom_glink_send(channel, data, len, false);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int qcom_glink_sendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len, u32 dst)
>> +{
>> +	struct glink_channel *channel = to_glink_channel(ept);
>> +
>> +	return __qcom_glink_send(channel, data, len, true);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_glink_trysendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len, u32 dst)
>> +{
>> +	struct glink_channel *channel = to_glink_channel(ept);
>> +
>> +	return __qcom_glink_send(channel, data, len, false);
>> +}
> 
> Just rename send() to sendto() and trysend() to trysendto() and ignore the
> destination address.  

Function prototypes have to match with rpmsg_endpoint_ops structure defined
below. So seems to me not possible to just rename the functions.
Please could you clarify if i missed something?

> The same goes for the next patch.  I would fold patch 08
> and 09 into 10 to help get the big picture.

I'm going to squash all in one.

Thanks,
Arnaud

> 
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Finds the device_node for the glink child interested in this channel.
>>   */
>> @@ -1364,7 +1378,9 @@ static const struct rpmsg_device_ops glink_device_ops = {
>>  static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops glink_endpoint_ops = {
>>  	.destroy_ept = qcom_glink_destroy_ept,
>>  	.send = qcom_glink_send,
>> +	.sendto = qcom_glink_sendto,
>>  	.trysend = qcom_glink_trysend,
>> +	.trysendto = qcom_glink_trysendto,
>>  };
>>  
>>  static void qcom_glink_rpdev_release(struct device *dev)
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>