[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEIetFdcuYZU98s/@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:06:12 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, Ian Ray <ian.ray@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] serial: imx: Add DMA buffer configuration via sysfs
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 12:50:58PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> From: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com>
>
> In order to optimize serial communication (performance/throughput VS
> latency), we may need to tweak DMA period number and size. This adds
> sysfs attributes to configure those values before initialising DMA.
> The defaults will stay the same as before (16 buffers with a size of
> 1024 bytes). Afterwards the values can be read/write with the
> following sysfs files:
>
> /sys/class/tty/ttymxc*/dma_buffer_size
> /sys/class/tty/ttymxc*/dma_buffer_count
Ick no. Custom sysfs attributes for things like serial ports are crazy.
> This is mainly needed for GEHC CS ONE (arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts),
> which has multiple microcontrollers connected via UART controlling. One
> of the UARTs is connected to an on-board microcontroller at 19200 baud,
> which constantly pushes critical data (so aging character detect
> interrupt will never trigger). This data must be processed at 50-200 Hz,
> so UART should return data in less than 5-20ms. With 1024 byte DMA
> buffer (and a constant data stream) the read operation instead needs
> 1024 byte / 19200 baud = 53.333ms, which is way too long (note: Worst
> Case would be remote processor sending data with short pauses <= 7
> characters, which would further increase this number). The current
> downstream kernel instead configures 24 bytes resulting in 1.25ms,
> but that is obviously not sensible for normal UART use cases and cannot
> be used as new default.
Why can't this be a device tree attribute? Why does this have to be a
sysfs thing that no one will know how to tune and set over time. This
hardware should not force a user to manually tune it to get it to work
properly, this isn't the 1990's anymore :(
Please never force a user to choose stuff like this, they never will
know what to do.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists