[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <005401d71161$ef9b20e0$ced162a0$@emc.com.tw>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:50:35 +0800
From: "jingle" <jingle.wu@....com.tw>
To: "'Dmitry Torokhov'" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-input'" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"'phoenix'" <phoenix@....com.tw>,
"'dave.wang'" <dave.wang@....com.tw>,
"'josh.chen'" <josh.chen@....com.tw>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Input: elan_i2c - Reduce the resume time for new dev ices
HI Dmitry:
1. You mean to let all devices ignore skipping reset/sleep part of device
initialization?
2. The test team found that some old firmware will have errors (invalid
report etc...), so ELAN can only ensure that the new device can meet the
newer parts.
Thanks
jingle
-----Original Message-----
From: 'Dmitry Torokhov' [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@...il.com]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2021 9:31 AM
To: jingle
Cc: 'linux-kernel'; 'linux-input'; 'phoenix'; 'dave.wang'; 'josh.chen'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: elan_i2c - Reduce the resume time for new dev
ices
Hi Jingle,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:24:05AM +0800, jingle wrote:
> HI Dmitry:
>
> In this case (in the newer parts behavior regarding need to reset
> after powering them on), it is consistent with the original driver
> behavior with any new or old device (be called
> data->ops->initialize(client) : usleep(100) , etc.. , because this
> times "data->quirks" is equal 0 at probe state.)
You misunderstood my question. I was asking what specifically, if anything,
was changed in the firmware to allow skipping reset/sleep part of device
initialization on newer parts during resume process. Because of there were
no specific changes I would say let's not do a quirk and change the driver
to skip reset on resume.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists