[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210306120702.4d347663@monster.powergraphx.local>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 12:07:02 +0100
From: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...teo.net>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: hwlock: add sun6i_hwspinlock
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:22:33 +0100
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:12:44 +0100
> > Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:03:28PM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> > > > Adds documentation on how to use the sun6i_hwspinlock driver for sun6i
> > > > compatible series SoCs.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@...teo.net>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v6:
> > > > - fixed formating and name issues in dt documentation
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v5:
> > > > - changed binding to earliest known supported SoC sun6i-a31
> > > > - dropped unnecessary entries
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > - changed binding to sun8i-a33-hwpinlock
> > > > - added changes suggested by Maxime Ripard
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > - changed symbols from sunxi to sun8i
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - fixed memory ranges
> > > > ---
> > > > .../hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-hwspinlock.yaml | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >
> > > The name of the file doesn't match the compatible, once fixed:
> > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> >
> > This is something that still confuses me. What if you have more than one
> > compatible string?
>
> In this case, it's fairly easy there's only one :)
>
> But we're following the same rule than the compatible: the first SoC
> that got the compatible wins
>
> > This won't be solvable. See the qcom binding for example,
> > there are two strings and none matches. In the omap bindings are also two
> > strings and only one matches. In all cases, including mine, the bindings
> > check script is fine with that.
>
> If other platforms want to follow other rules, good for them :)
>
> > So, you basically want it to be called
> > "allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml"?
>
> Yes
Is it okay if I provide only the fixed bindings? I assume the v6 driver is
fine now.
greetings,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists