| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <161503094413.398.12671142306360940289.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:42:24 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched: Simplify migration_cpu_stop()
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: e140749c9f194d65f5984a5941e46758377c93c0
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e140749c9f194d65f5984a5941e46758377c93c0
Author: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:22:30 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 12:40:21 +01:00
sched: Simplify migration_cpu_stop()
Since, when ->stop_pending, only the stopper can uninstall
p->migration_pending. This could simplify a few ifs, because:
(pending != NULL) => (pending == p->migration_pending)
Also, the fatty comment above affine_move_task() probably needs a bit
of gardening.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9819121..f9dfb34 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1927,6 +1927,12 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
/*
+ * If we were passed a pending, then ->stop_pending was set, thus
+ * p->migration_pending must have remained stable.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(pending && pending != p->migration_pending);
+
+ /*
* If task_rq(p) != rq, it cannot be migrated here, because we're
* holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because
* we're holding p->pi_lock.
@@ -1936,8 +1942,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
goto out;
if (pending) {
- if (p->migration_pending == pending)
- p->migration_pending = NULL;
+ p->migration_pending = NULL;
complete = true;
}
@@ -1976,8 +1981,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
* somewhere allowed, we're done.
*/
if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_ptr)) {
- if (p->migration_pending == pending)
- p->migration_pending = NULL;
+ p->migration_pending = NULL;
complete = true;
goto out;
}
@@ -2165,16 +2169,21 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
*
* (1) In the cases covered above. There is one more where the completion is
* signaled within affine_move_task() itself: when a subsequent affinity request
- * cancels the need for an active migration. Consider:
+ * occurs after the stopper bailed out due to the targeted task still being
+ * Migrate-Disable. Consider:
*
* Initial conditions: P0->cpus_mask = [0, 1]
*
- * P0@...0 P1 P2
- *
- * migrate_disable();
- * <preempted>
+ * CPU0 P1 P2
+ * <P0>
+ * migrate_disable();
+ * <preempted>
* set_cpus_allowed_ptr(P0, [1]);
* <blocks>
+ * <migration/0>
+ * migration_cpu_stop()
+ * is_migration_disabled()
+ * <bails>
* set_cpus_allowed_ptr(P0, [0, 1]);
* <signal completion>
* <awakes>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists