[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210306162834.7339-1-ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:28:34 +0200
From: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
To: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: [PATCH] iio: kfifo: mask flags without zero-check in devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup()
As pointed by Lars, this doesn't require a zero-check. Also, while looking
at this a little closer at it (again), the masking can be done later, as
there is a zero-check for 'mode_flags' anyway, which returns -EINVAL. And
we only need the 'mode_flags' later in the logic.
This change is more of a tweak.
Fixes: ae9886d6aa29 ("iio: kfifo: add devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup() helper")
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
---
Apologies for the late-ness of this.
I don't know if this makes sense to squash in the original, or to have
as a fix commit.
It is a bit messy now that the original is committed into the tree,
and now we're fixing/tweaking it.
drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c
index e8a434f84778..8e3a1a9e495c 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c
@@ -275,9 +275,6 @@ int devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup(struct device *dev,
{
struct iio_buffer *buffer;
- if (mode_flags)
- mode_flags &= kfifo_access_funcs.modes;
-
if (!mode_flags)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -285,6 +282,8 @@ int devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup(struct device *dev,
if (!buffer)
return -ENOMEM;
+ mode_flags &= kfifo_access_funcs.modes;
+
indio_dev->modes |= mode_flags;
indio_dev->setup_ops = setup_ops;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists