[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab2c3bc2-6dac-3c5c-3589-9383c459f478@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:13:11 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, hare@...e.de,
ming.lei@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pragalla@...eaurora.org, kashyap.desai@...adcom.com,
yuyufen@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] blk-mq: Clean up references to old requests
when freeing rqs
On 3/5/21 7:14 AM, John Garry wrote:
> @@ -2296,10 +2296,14 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>
> for (i = 0; i < tags->nr_tags; i++) {
> struct request *rq = tags->static_rqs[i];
> + int j;
>
> if (!rq)
> continue;
> set->ops->exit_request(set, rq, hctx_idx);
> + /* clean up any references which occur in @ref_tags */
> + for (j = 0; ref_tags && j < ref_tags->nr_tags; j++)
> + cmpxchg(&ref_tags->rqs[j], rq, 0);
> tags->static_rqs[i] = NULL;
> }
> }
What prevents blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() from reading hctx->tags[...]
before the cmpxcg() call and dereferencing it after blk_mq_free_rqs()
has called __free_pages()?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists