linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] usb: gadget: s3c: Fix the error handling path in 's3c2410_udc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b73a1cd-b4b7-baec-1062-b9f1a1634cbd@canonical.com>
Date:   Sat, 6 Mar 2021 19:17:39 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        gustavoars@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, ben-linux@...ff.org
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] usb: gadget: s3c: Fix the error handling path in
 's3c2410_udc_probe()'

On 06/03/2021 18:22, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 06/03/2021 à 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 06/03/2021 15:21, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Some 'clk_prepare_enable()' and 'clk_get()' must be undone in the error
>>> handling path of the probe function, as already done in the remove
>>> function.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3fc154b6b813 ("USB Gadget driver for Samsung s3c2410 ARM SoC")
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>>> ---
>>> v2: Fix a stupid error in the hash in Fixes:
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/s3c2410_udc.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Do not ignore received tags but add them before sending a new version of patch.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/36ef897b-aedc-fcc3-89c8-c602d9733a9b@canonical.com/T/#t
>>
>> Also somehow your 2nd patch is not in-reply to first one. Don't change
>> the settings of sending patches. git format-patch and
>> git send-email default settings are correct. Look here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/
>> Only your patches are not threaded.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Hi,
> 
> sorry for missing the typo in the first patch.
> 
> For your other comments above, however, I use standard settings only.
> My patches are generated by commands like:
>     git format-patch -2
> 
> I use cover letter only if it looks useful. In such a case, I use:
>     git format-patch --thread --cover-letter -2
> 
> I've never seen that threading series was the rule and/or that cover 
> letters were a must have. If I'm wrong, sorry, I was not aware of that.

The cover letter is not needed. The threading was missing which is a
default so you had to configure it to that.


Best regards,
Krzysztof