linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/102] 5.10.21-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YES7QrvKHWPKOo9W@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Mar 2021 12:38:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Samuel Zou <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/102] 5.10.21-rc1 review

On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 02:25:44PM +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/3/5 20:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.21 release.
> > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:08:39 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.21-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Our test CI monitored the 5.10.21-rc1, and compile failure on arm64:
> 
> Kernel repo:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Branch: linux-5.10.y
> Arch: arm64/x86
> Version: 5.10.21-rc1+
> Commit: 80aaabbaf433294d1f075981fa3785d7f4b55159
> Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
> 
> 
> arm64 (compile failure)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kernel build failed, error log:
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:683:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘IRQ_WORK_INIT’; did you mean ‘QSTR_INIT’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func);
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   QSTR_INIT
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:683:2: error: invalid initializer
> 
> 
> x86 (No kernel failures)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Testcase Result Summary:
> total_num: 4716
> succeed_num: 4714
> failed_num: 2
> timeout_num: 0
> 
> Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h