[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210307171824.GA22500@amd>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 18:18:25 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/102] 5.10.21-rc1 review
Hi!
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.21 release.
> > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> Here situation is similar to 4.4
>
> [ 27.349919] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=CVE-2017-5715 RESULT=fail>
> Received signal: <TESTCASE> TEST_CASE_ID=CVE-2017-5715 RESULT=fail
>
> So I see some kind of failure, and this time I suspect real kernel
> problem.
>
> https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/171825
>
> 4.19 has similar problem:
>
> https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/171812
>
> Again, Ccing Chris, but it looks like something is wrong there.
It went away after I reran the tests, and the old tests failed due to
timeout. So it looks like server with qemu was overloaded or something
like that. There are still failures, but they are "boards not
available" kind, so not a kernel problem.
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@...x.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists