[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346dbb1-c43e-9ac2-10e4-3c10cb2ead78@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:00:23 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
x86@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] x86/paravirt: switch time pvops functions to use
static_call()
On 3/8/21 7:28 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> @@ -379,11 +379,6 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static const struct pv_time_ops xen_time_ops __initconst = {
> - .sched_clock = xen_sched_clock,
> - .steal_clock = xen_steal_clock,
> -};
> -
> static struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *xen_clock __read_mostly;
> static u64 xen_clock_value_saved;
>
> @@ -528,7 +523,8 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
> void __init xen_init_time_ops(void)
> {
> xen_sched_clock_offset = xen_clocksource_read();
> - pv_ops.time = xen_time_ops;
> + static_call_update(pv_steal_clock, xen_steal_clock);
> + paravirt_set_sched_clock(xen_sched_clock);
>
> x86_init.timers.timer_init = xen_time_init;
> x86_init.timers.setup_percpu_clockev = x86_init_noop;
> @@ -570,7 +566,8 @@ void __init xen_hvm_init_time_ops(void)
> }
>
> xen_sched_clock_offset = xen_clocksource_read();
> - pv_ops.time = xen_time_ops;
> + static_call_update(pv_steal_clock, xen_steal_clock);
> + paravirt_set_sched_clock(xen_sched_clock);
> x86_init.timers.setup_percpu_clockev = xen_time_init;
> x86_cpuinit.setup_percpu_clockev = xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents;
There is a bunch of stuff that's common between the two cases so it can be factored out.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/time.c b/drivers/xen/time.c
> index 108edbcbc040..152dd33bb223 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/time.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/time.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/math64.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
>
> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ void __init xen_time_setup_guest(void)
> xen_runstate_remote = !HYPERVISOR_vm_assist(VMASST_CMD_enable,
> VMASST_TYPE_runstate_update_flag);
>
> - pv_ops.time.steal_clock = xen_steal_clock;
> + static_call_update(pv_steal_clock, xen_steal_clock);
>
Do we actually need this? We've already set this up in xen_init_time_ops(). (But maybe for ARM).
-boris
> static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_enabled);
> if (xen_runstate_remote)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists