lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <963232a4-9100-ebca-927c-7f5a1e947fbe@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:58:25 +0530
From:   Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>, <p.yadav@...com>,
        <michael@...le.cc>
CC:     <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        <richard@....at>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mtd: spi-nor: Move Software Write Protection logic
 out of the core



On 3/6/21 3:20 PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> It makes the core file a bit smaller and provides better separation
> between the Software Write Protection features and the core logic.
> All the next generic software write protection features (e.g. Individual
> Block Protection) will reside in swp.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Makefile |   2 +-
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c   | 407 +---------------------------------
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h   |   4 +
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c    | 419 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hmmm, name swp.c does not seem intuitive to me. How about expanding it a
bit:

soft-wr-protect.c or software-write-protect.c ?

Regards
Vignesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ