[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEZ8f3En2ZEqJX+X@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:35:27 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] gpiolib: switch to fwnode in the core
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:26:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:23 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> <bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 7:22 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:13 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > AFAICT this should go through the GPIO tree as usual. Any reason for
> > you to pick these patches this time?
>
> My impression was that Andy wanted me to take them.
Hmm... I guess the MAINTAINERS pointed to your name due to changes in GPIO ACPI
library, but most of them indeed are GPIO core ones. Perhaps I have to clarify
that in the cover letter.
> However, if you'd rather take care of them yourself, there you go!
>
> I'll drop them now and assume that they will be routed through the GPIO tree.
Anyway, thank you for the review, it is useful!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists