[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5709f180-04b5-09b2-e1c4-53eb5c9345d8@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:59:01 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Errant readings on LM81 with T2080 SoC
On 3/7/21 8:37 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
[ ... ]
>> That's from -ENXIO which is used in only one place in i2c-mpc.c. I'll
>> enable some debug and see what we get.
>
> For the errant readings there was nothing abnormal reported by the driver.
>
> For the "No such device or address" I saw "mpc-i2c ffe119000.i2c: No
> RXAK" which matches up with the -ENXIO return.
>
Id suggest to check the time until not busy and stop in mpc_xfer().
Those hot loops are unusual, and may well mess up the code especially
if preempt is enabled. Also, are you using interrupts or polling in
your system ? The interrupt handler looks a bit odd, with "Read again
to allow register to stabilise".
Do you have fsl,timeout set in the devicetree properties and, if so,
have you played with it ?
Other than that, the only other real idea I have would be to monitor
the i2c bus.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists