linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/28] KVM: nSVM: inject exceptions via svm_check_nested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YEaMhHG7ylvTpoYD@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:43:48 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, mlevitsk@...hat.com,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/28] KVM: nSVM: inject exceptions via
 svm_check_nested_events

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/03/21 17:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > VMCALL is also probably ok
> > in most scenarios, but patching L2's code from L0 KVM is sketchy.
> 
> I agree that patching is sketchy and I'll send a patch.  However...
> 
> > > The same is true for the VMware #GP interception case.
> > 
> > I highly doubt that will ever work out as intended for the modified IO #GP
> > behavior.  The only way emulating #GP in L2 is correct if L1 wants to pass
> > through the capabilities to L2, i.e. the I/O access isn't intercepted by L1.
> > That seems unlikely.
> 
> ... not all hypervisors trap everything.  In particular in this case the
> VMCS12 I/O permission bitmap should be consulted (which we do in
> vmx_check_intercept_io), but if the I/O is not trapped by L1 it should
> bypass the IOPL and TSS-bitmap checks in my opinion.

I agree, _if_ it's not trapped.  But bypassing the checks when it is trapped is
clearly wrong.