[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod7Cg9x4x8Jmgu6z9LAn0y-1OosnHSUCL_=DcCfgbGThJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:57:06 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v8 PATCH 11/13] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate
shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:13 PM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Now nr_deferred is available on per memcg level for memcg aware shrinkers, so don't need
> allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for such shrinkers anymore.
>
> The prealloc_memcg_shrinker() would return -ENOSYS if !CONFIG_MEMCG or memcg is disabled
> by kernel command line, then shrinker's SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE flag would be cleared.
> This makes the implementation of this patch simpler.
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists