[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210308234353.GB4247@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:43:53 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, linuxarm@...wei.com,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: make the vfio_pci_mmap_fault reentrant
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:21:06PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > index 65e7e6b..6928c37 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > @@ -1613,6 +1613,7 @@ static vm_fault_t vfio_pci_mmap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> > struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = vma->vm_private_data;
> > vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> > + unsigned long pfn;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&vdev->vma_lock);
> > down_read(&vdev->memory_lock);
> > @@ -1623,18 +1624,23 @@ static vm_fault_t vfio_pci_mmap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > goto up_out;
> > }
> >
> > - if (__vfio_pci_add_vma(vdev, vma)) {
> > - ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
> > + if (!follow_pfn(vma, vma->vm_start, &pfn)) {
> > mutex_unlock(&vdev->vma_lock);
> > goto up_out;
Gah, no new follow_pfn users please we are trying to delete this
stuff..
I believe the right fix is to change the fault handler to use
vmf_insert_pfn_prot() which has all the right locking/etc
The
> I'm surprised that it's left to the fault handler to provide this
> serialization, is this because we're filling the entire vma rather than
> only the faulting page?
I think it is because remap_pfn is not intended to be called from a
fault handler. The fault handler APIs seem to be named vmf_* ..
If you want to use remap API it has to be done and managed outside the
fault handler. Ie when the MMIO transitions from valid->invalid vfio-pci
wipes the address space, when it transitions from invalid->valid it
calls remap_pfn. vfio-pci provides its own locking to protect these
state transitions. fault simply always triggers sigbus
I recall we discussed this design when you made the original patches
but I don't completely recall why it ended this way, however I think
the reason might disappear after the address_space conversion in your
other series.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists