linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee596471-db9b-43e4-c085-9bd938101587@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:48:32 +0100
From:   Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions
 compatible

On 16.02.2021 22:26, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Document nvmem-partitions compatible used to treat mtd partitions as a
> nvmem provider.

I'm just wondering if "nvmem-partitions" is accurate enough. Partitions
bit sounds a bit ambiguous in the mtd context.

What do you think about "mtd-nvmem-cells" or just "nvmem-cells"?