| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YEX+INKSPAzAcvFg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:36:16 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Add test cases for
fwnode_property_count_*() APIs
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:25:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Add test cases for fwnode_property_count_*() APIs.
>
> While at it, modify the arrays of integers to be size of non-power-of-2
> for better test coverage and decreasing stack usage.
Any comments on this?
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
> index abe03315180f..3a4f755c483c 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
> node = fwnode_create_software_node(entries, NULL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, node);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u8(node, "prop-u8");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8);
> @@ -48,6 +51,9 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
> @@ -65,6 +71,9 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
> @@ -82,6 +91,9 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
> @@ -95,15 +107,19 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
> error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "no-prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
>
> + /* Count 64-bit values as 16-bit */
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u64");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 4);
> +
> fwnode_remove_software_node(node);
> }
>
> static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
> {
> - static const u8 a_u8[16] = { 8, 9 };
> - static const u16 a_u16[16] = { 16, 17 };
> - static const u32 a_u32[16] = { 32, 33 };
> - static const u64 a_u64[16] = { 64, 65 };
> + static const u8 a_u8[10] = { 8, 9 };
> + static const u16 a_u16[10] = { 16, 17 };
> + static const u32 a_u32[10] = { 32, 33 };
> + static const u64 a_u64[10] = { 64, 65 };
> static const struct property_entry entries[] = {
> PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY("prop-u8", a_u8),
> PROPERTY_ENTRY_U16_ARRAY("prop-u16", a_u16),
> @@ -126,6 +142,9 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u8(node, "prop-u8");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
> @@ -148,6 +167,9 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
> @@ -170,6 +192,9 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
> @@ -192,6 +217,9 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64);
>
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
> @@ -210,6 +238,14 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
> error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "no-prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
>
> + /* Count 64-bit values as 16-bit */
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u64");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 40);
> +
> + /* Other way around */
> + error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u16");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 2);
> +
> fwnode_remove_software_node(node);
> }
>
> @@ -239,6 +275,9 @@ static void pe_test_strings(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, str, "single");
>
> + error = fwnode_property_string_array_count(node, "str");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_string_array(node, "str", strs, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, strs[0], "single");
> @@ -258,6 +297,9 @@ static void pe_test_strings(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, str, "");
>
> + error = fwnode_property_string_array_count(node, "strs");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 2);
> +
> error = fwnode_property_read_string_array(node, "strs", strs, 3);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 2);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, strs[0], "string-a");
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists