linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/5] mm/hugetlb: optimize the surplus state transfer code in move_hugetlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210308112809.26107-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:28:06 -0500
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] mm/hugetlb: optimize the surplus state transfer code in move_hugetlb_state()

We should not transfer the per-node surplus state when we do not cross the
node in order to save some cpu cycles

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 33a3edf79022..695603071f2c 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5621,6 +5621,12 @@ void move_hugetlb_state(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage, int reason)
 		SetHPageTemporary(oldpage);
 		ClearHPageTemporary(newpage);
 
+		/*
+		 * There is no need to transfer the per-node surplus state
+		 * when we do not cross the node.
+		 */
+		if (new_nid == old_nid)
+			return;
 		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
 		if (h->surplus_huge_pages_node[old_nid]) {
 			h->surplus_huge_pages_node[old_nid]--;
-- 
2.19.1