[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEVvnvFNpfld7MXM@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 00:28:14 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, autofs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, alexander@...alicyn.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] autofs: find_autofs_mount overmounted parent support
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 12:12:22AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Wait, so you have /proc overmounted, without anything autofs-related on
> /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc and still want to have the pathname resolved, just
> because it would've resolved with that overmount of /proc removed?
>
> I hope I'm misreading you; in case I'm not, the ABI is extremely
> tasteless and until you manage to document the exact semantics you want
> for param->path, consider it NAKed.
BTW, if that thing would be made to work, what's to stop somebody from
doing ...at() syscalls with the resulting fd as a starting point and pathnames
starting with ".."? "/foo is overmounted, but we can get to anything under
/foo/bar/ in the underlying tree since there's an autofs mount somewhere in
/foo/bar/splat/puke/*"?
IOW, the real question (aside of "WTF?") is what are you using the
resulting descriptor for and what do you need to be able to do with it.
Details, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists