| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy0TwcE17-GJp664of4DV_R+6Q-S_h-N4Sbv9KL4Xofxvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:48:20 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Sandeep Tripathy <milun.tripathy@...il.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: Add bindings documentation for
RISC-V idle states
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:52 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 03:07:57PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > The RISC-V CPU idle states will be described in DT under the
> > /cpus/riscv-idle-states DT node. This patch adds the bindings
> > documentation for riscv-idle-states DT nodes and idle state DT
> > nodes under it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml | 250 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 250 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..3eff763fed23
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/riscv/idle-states.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: RISC-V idle states binding description
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > + RISC-V systems can manage power consumption dynamically, where HARTs
> > + (or CPUs) [1] can be put in different platform specific suspend (or
> > + idle) states (ranging from simple WFI, power gating, etc). The RISC-V
> > + SBI [2] hart state management extension provides a standard mechanism
> > + for OSes to request HART state transitions.
> > +
> > + The platform specific suspend (or idle) states of a hart can be either
> > + retentive or non-rententive in nature. A retentive suspend state will
> > + preserve hart register and CSR values for all privilege modes whereas
> > + a non-retentive suspend state will not preserve hart register and CSR
> > + values. The suspend (or idle) state entered by executing the WFI
> > + instruction is considered standard on all RISC-V systems and therefore
> > + must not be listed in device tree.
> > +
> > + The device tree binding definition for RISC-V idle states described
> > + in this document is quite similar to the ARM idle states [3].
> > +
> > + References
> > +
> > + [1] RISC-V Linux Kernel documentation - CPUs bindings
> > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> > +
> > + [2] RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI)
> > + http://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc/riscv-sbi.adoc
> > +
> > + [3] ARM idle states binding description - Idle states bindings
> > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
>
> I'd assume there's common parts we can share.
Yes, except few properties most are the same.
We can have a shared DT bindings for both ARM and RISC-V but
both architectures will always have some architecture specific details
(or properties) which need to be documented under arch specific
DT documentation. Is it okay if this is done as a separate series ?
>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + $nodename:
> > + const: riscv-idle-states
>
> Just 'idle-states' like Arm.
I had tried "idle-states" node name but DT bindings check complaints
conflict with ARM idle state bindings.
>
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^(cpu|cluster)-":
> > + type: object
> > + description: |
> > + Each state node represents an idle state description and must be
> > + defined as follows.
> > +
>
> additionalProperties: false
okay, will update.
>
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: riscv,idle-state
> > +
> > + local-timer-stop:
> > + description:
> > + If present the CPU local timer control logic is lost on state
> > + entry, otherwise it is retained.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + entry-latency-us:
> > + description:
> > + Worst case latency in microseconds required to enter the idle state.
> > +
> > + exit-latency-us:
> > + description:
> > + Worst case latency in microseconds required to exit the idle state.
> > + The exit-latency-us duration may be guaranteed only after
> > + entry-latency-us has passed.
> > +
> > + min-residency-us:
> > + description:
> > + Minimum residency duration in microseconds, inclusive of preparation
> > + and entry, for this idle state to be considered worthwhile energy
> > + wise (refer to section 2 of this document for a complete description).
> > +
> > + wakeup-latency-us:
> > + description: |
> > + Maximum delay between the signaling of a wake-up event and the CPU
> > + being able to execute normal code again. If omitted, this is assumed
> > + to be equal to:
> > +
> > + entry-latency-us + exit-latency-us
> > +
> > + It is important to supply this value on systems where the duration
> > + of PREP phase (see diagram 1, section 2) is non-neglibigle. In such
> > + systems entry-latency-us + exit-latency-us will exceed
> > + wakeup-latency-us by this duration.
> > +
> > + idle-state-name:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> > + description:
> > + A string used as a descriptive name for the idle state.
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - entry-latency-us
> > + - exit-latency-us
> > + - min-residency-us
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
I will move this up.
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > +
> > + cpus {
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + cpu@0 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + compatible = "riscv";
> > + reg = <0x0>;
> > + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> > + mmu-type = "riscv,sv48";
> > + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_RET_0_0 &CPU_NONRET_0_0
> > + &CLUSTER_RET_0 &CLUSTER_NONRET_0>;
>
> You should need to add this property to your cpu schema.
Okay, will update.
>
> > +
> > + cpu_intc0: interrupt-controller {
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + cpu@1 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + compatible = "riscv";
> > + reg = <0x1>;
> > + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> > + mmu-type = "riscv,sv48";
> > + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_RET_0_0 &CPU_NONRET_0_0
> > + &CLUSTER_RET_0 &CLUSTER_NONRET_0>;
> > +
> > + cpu_intc1: interrupt-controller {
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + cpu@10 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + compatible = "riscv";
> > + reg = <0x10>;
> > + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> > + mmu-type = "riscv,sv48";
> > + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_RET_1_0 &CPU_NONRET_1_0
> > + &CLUSTER_RET_1 &CLUSTER_NONRET_1>;
> > +
> > + cpu_intc10: interrupt-controller {
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + cpu@11 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + compatible = "riscv";
> > + reg = <0x11>;
> > + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> > + mmu-type = "riscv,sv48";
> > + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_RET_1_0 &CPU_NONRET_1_0
> > + &CLUSTER_RET_1 &CLUSTER_NONRET_1>;
> > +
> > + cpu_intc11: interrupt-controller {
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + riscv-idle-states {
> > + CPU_RET_0_0: cpu-retentive-0-0 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x10000000>;
>
> Not documented.
Ahh, I missed this one. I will add it in next patch revision.
>
> > + entry-latency-us = <20>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <40>;
> > + min-residency-us = <80>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CPU_NONRET_0_0: cpu-nonretentive-0-0 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x90000000>;
> > + entry-latency-us = <250>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <500>;
> > + min-residency-us = <950>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CLUSTER_RET_0: cluster-retentive-0 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x11000000>;
> > + local-timer-stop;
> > + entry-latency-us = <50>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <100>;
> > + min-residency-us = <250>;
> > + wakeup-latency-us = <130>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CLUSTER_NONRET_0: cluster-nonretentive-0 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x91000000>;
> > + local-timer-stop;
> > + entry-latency-us = <600>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <1100>;
> > + min-residency-us = <2700>;
> > + wakeup-latency-us = <1500>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CPU_RET_1_0: cpu-retentive-1-0 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x10000010>;
> > + entry-latency-us = <20>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <40>;
> > + min-residency-us = <80>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CPU_NONRET_1_0: cpu-nonretentive-1-0 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x90000010>;
> > + entry-latency-us = <250>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <500>;
> > + min-residency-us = <950>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CLUSTER_RET_1: cluster-retentive-1 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x11000010>;
> > + local-timer-stop;
> > + entry-latency-us = <50>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <100>;
> > + min-residency-us = <250>;
> > + wakeup-latency-us = <130>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + CLUSTER_NONRET_1: cluster-nonretentive-1 {
> > + compatible = "riscv,idle-state";
> > + riscv,sbi-suspend-param = <0x91000010>;
> > + local-timer-stop;
> > + entry-latency-us = <600>;
> > + exit-latency-us = <1100>;
> > + min-residency-us = <2700>;
> > + wakeup-latency-us = <1500>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > +...
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists