[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84b54b6c741fec920f26fc47890da40bf25cae49.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:09:45 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-power@...rohmeurope.com, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] mfd: bd9576: Add safety limit/monitoring
registers
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 13:47 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>
> > ROHM BD9576 contains safety features like over/under voltage
> > detection,
> > over curren detection and over temperature detection. Add the
> > configuration register information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v7:
> > New patch
> >
> > include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
> > b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
> > index 3f351a1ae4ab..2bd35260ee8e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h
> > @@ -116,6 +116,25 @@ enum {
> > #define BD957X_REG_VOUT4_TUNE 0x59
> > #define BD957X_REG_VOUTL1_TUNE 0x5c
> >
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT1_OVD 0x51
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT1_UVD 0x52
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT2_OVD 0x54
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT2_UVD 0x55
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT3_OVD 0x57
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT3_UVD 0x58
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT4_OVD 0x5a
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT4_UVD 0x5b
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUTL1_OVD 0x5d
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUTL1_UVD 0x5e
> > +
> > +#define BD9576_MASK_XVD 0x7f
> > +
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT1S_OCW 0x5f
> > +#define BD9576_REG_VOUT1S_OCP 0x60
> > +
> > +#define BD9576_MASK_VOUT1S_OCW 0x3f
> > +#define BD9576_MASK_VOUT1S_OCP 0x3f
>
> Just a quick check, are these meant to be the same value?
Thanks for the check. They are both same value.
>
> If so:
>
> For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):
>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
Thanks, I'll add your ack.
Best Regards
Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists