[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <262c0955-0283-6812-c841-cd1f18acf835@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:26:58 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: david@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE
On 3/8/21 4:19 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 02.03.21 18:44, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>> The current handling of the MVPG instruction when executed in a nested
>> guest is wrong, and can lead to the nested guest hanging.
>>
>> This patchset fixes the behaviour to be more architecturally correct,
>> and fixes the hangs observed.
>>
>> v4->v5
>> * split kvm_s390_logical_to_effective so it can be reused for vSIE
>> * fix existing comments and add some more comments
>> * use the new split _kvm_s390_logical_to_effective in vsie_handle_mvpg
>>
>> v3->v4
>> * added PEI_ prefix to DAT_PROT and NOT_PTE macros
>> * added small comment to explain what they are about
>>
>> v2->v3
>> * improved some comments
>> * improved some variable and parameter names for increased readability
>> * fixed missing handling of page faults in the MVPG handler
>> * small readability improvements
>>
>> v1->v2
>> * complete rewrite
>
>
> queued (with small fixups) for kvms390. Still not sure if this will land in master or next.
> Opinions?
I'd go for the next merge window
>>
>> Claudio Imbrenda (3):
>> s390/kvm: split kvm_s390_logical_to_effective
>> s390/kvm: extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return entry pointer
>> s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE
>>
>> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 30 ++++++++++--
>> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 35 ++++++++++---
>> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists