[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12c5050f-feb3-e07f-45d2-5e89b678841a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:33:44 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: max8997_charger: make EXTCON dependency
unconditional
On 08/03/2021 16:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Some of the extcon interfaces have a fallback implementation that can
> be used when EXTCON is disabled, but some others do not, causing a
> build failure:
>
> drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c:261:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_extcon_register_notifier_all' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> ret = devm_extcon_register_notifier_all(&pdev->dev, charger->edev,
> ^
> drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c:261:9: note: did you mean 'devm_extcon_register_notifier'?
> include/linux/extcon.h:263:19: note: 'devm_extcon_register_notifier' declared here
> static inline int devm_extcon_register_notifier(struct device *dev,
>
> I assume there is no reason to actually build this driver without extcon
> support, so a hard dependency is the easiest fix. Alternatively the
> header file could be extended to provide additional inline stubs.
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for the patch but I think I got it covered with:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210215100610.19911-2-cw00.choi@samsung.com/
(sent via extcon tree).
Did you experience a new/different issue?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists