linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: lpass-wsa-macro: fix RX MIX input controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 08 Mar 2021 16:06:48 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:QCOM AUDIO ASoC DRIVERS" 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: lpass-wsa-macro: fix RX MIX input controls

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:50:48 -0500, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> Attempting to use the RX MIX path at 48kHz plays at 96kHz, because these
> controls are incorrectly toggling the first bit of the register, which
> is part of the FS_RATE field.
> 
> Fix the problem by using the same method used by the "WSA RX_MIX EC0_MUX"
> control, which is to use SND_SOC_NOPM as the register and use an enum in
> the shift field instead.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codecs: lpass-wsa-macro: fix RX MIX input controls
      commit: 810c4ac485e9de34624469a1c5ad1453699b993c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark