[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3109f0b1-a47d-47e8-cd9c-ac47d8364761@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:47:18 +0100
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "pinctrl: intel: Split
intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance"
On 3/8/21 5:46 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:44 PM Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 3/8/21 5:31 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:25:05PM +0100, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>>>>> Following commit 036e126c72eb ("pinctrl: intel: Split
>>>>> intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance"),
>>>>> gpiochip_get_desc() is broken on some Kaby Lake R devices (specifically
>>>>> a Microsoft Surface Book 2), returning -EINVAL for GPIOs that in reality
>>>>> should be there (they are defined in ACPI and have been accessible
>>>>> previously). Due to this, gpiod_get() fails with -ENOENT.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reverting this commit fixes that issue and the GPIOs in question are
>>>>> accessible again.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have more information.
>>>> Can you enable PINCTRL and GPIO debug options in the kernel, and show dmesg
>>>> output (when kernel command line has 'ignore_loglevel' option) for both working
>>>> and non-working cases?
>>>>
>>>> Also if it's possible to have DSDT.dsl of the device in question along with
>>>> output of `grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status`.
>>>>
>>>>> There is probably a better option than straight up reverting this, so
>>>>> consider this more of a bug-report.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you test if the below helps (probably you have to apply it by editing
>>> the file manually):
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
>>> @@ -1392,6 +1392,7 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups_by_size(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
>>> gpps[i].size = min(gpp_size, npins);
>>> npins -= gpps[i].size;
>>>
>>> + gpps[i].gpio_base = gpps[i].base;
>>> gpps[i].padown_num = padown_num;
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That does fix the issue! Thanks for the fast response and fix!
>
> I'm about to send the formal patch. I will add the
> Reported-and-tested-by tag if you are okay with it.
>
Sure thing.
Thanks,
Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists