linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Show the GPIO base calculation explicitly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:51:37 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: Show the GPIO base calculation
 explicitly

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 06:49:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> During the split of intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups(), the _by_size() variant
> missed the GPIO base calculations and hence made unable to retrieve proper
> GPIO number.
> 
> Assign the gpio_base explicitly in _by_size() variant.
> 
> While at it, differentiate NOMAP case with the rest in _by_gpps() variant.
> 
> Fixes: 036e126c72eb ("pinctrl: intel: Split intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance")
> Reported-and-tested-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

I think this needs stable tag too.

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>