linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 07:56:30 -0800
From:   "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, cang@...eaurora.org,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "open list:TARGET SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER..." 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

On 3/8/2021 9:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:21 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:54:24PM -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now during my testing I see a weird issue sometimes (1 in 7).
>>>> Scenario - bootups
>>>>
>>>> Issue:
>>>> The supplier 'ufs_device_wlun 0:0:0:49488' goes into runtime suspend even
>>>> when one/more of its consumers are in RPM_ACTIVE state.
>>>>
>>>> *Log:
>>>> [   10.056379][  T206] sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>> [   10.062497][  T113] sd 0:0:0:5: [sdf] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>> [   10.356600][   T32] sd 0:0:0:7: [sdh] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>> [   10.362944][  T174] sd 0:0:0:3: [sdd] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>> [   10.696627][   T83] sd 0:0:0:2: [sdc] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>> [   10.704562][  T170] sd 0:0:0:6: [sdg] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>> [   10.980602][    T5] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>>
>>>> /** Printing all the consumer nodes of supplier **/
>>>> [   10.987327][    T5] ufs_device_wlun 0:0:0:49488: usage-count @ suspend: 0
>>>> <-- this is the usage_count
>>>> [   10.994440][    T5] ufs_rpmb_wlun 0:0:0:49476: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.000402][    T5] scsi 0:0:0:49456: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.005453][    T5] sd 0:0:0:0: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.009958][    T5] sd 0:0:0:1: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.014469][    T5] sd 0:0:0:2: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.019072][    T5] sd 0:0:0:3: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.023595][    T5] sd 0:0:0:4: PM state - 0 << RPM_ACTIVE
>>>> [   11.353298][    T5] sd 0:0:0:5: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.357726][    T5] sd 0:0:0:6: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.362155][    T5] sd 0:0:0:7: PM state - 2
>>>> [   11.366584][    T5] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: __ufshcd_wl_suspend - 8709
>>>> [   11.374366][    T5] ufs_device_wlun 0:0:0:49488: __ufshcd_wl_suspend -
>>>> (0) has rpm_active flags
>>
>> Do you mean that rpm_active of the link between the consumer and the
>> supplier is greater than 0 at this point and the consumer is
> 
> I mean is rpm_active of the link greater than 1 (because 1 means "no
> active references to the supplier")?
Hi Rafael:
No - it is not greater than 1.

I'm trying to understand what's going on in it; will update when I've 
something.

> 
>> RPM_ACTIVE, but the supplier suspends successfully nevertheless?
>>
>>>> [   11.383376][    T5] ufs_device_wlun 0:0:0:49488:
>>>> ufshcd_wl_runtime_suspend <-- Supplier suspends fine.
>>>> [   12.977318][  T174] sd 0:0:0:4: [sde] Synchronizing SCSI cache
>>>>
>>>> And the the suspend of sde is stuck now:
>>>> schedule+0x9c/0xe0
>>>> schedule_timeout+0x40/0x128
>>>> io_schedule_timeout+0x44/0x68
>>>> wait_for_common_io+0x7c/0x100
>>>> wait_for_completion_io+0x14/0x20
>>>> blk_execute_rq+0x90/0xcc
>>>> __scsi_execute+0x104/0x1c4
>>>> sd_sync_cache+0xf8/0x2a0
>>>> sd_suspend_common+0x74/0x11c
>>>> sd_suspend_runtime+0x14/0x20
>>>> scsi_runtime_suspend+0x64/0x94
>>>> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
>>>> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
>>>> pm_runtime_work+0x98/0xa8
>>>>
>>>> I added 'DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE' while creating links.
>>>>        if (hba->sdev_ufs_device) {
>>>>                link = device_link_add(&sdev->sdev_gendev,
>>>>                                    &hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev,
>>>>                                   DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME|DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
>>>> I didn't expect this to resolve the issue anyway and it didn't.
>>>>
>>>> Another interesting point here is when I resume any of the above suspended
>>>> consumers, it all goes back to normal, which is kind of expected. I tried
>>>> resuming the consumer and the supplier is resumed and the supplier is
>>>> suspended when all the consumers are suspended.
>>>>
>>>> Any pointers on this issue please?
>>>>
>>>> @Bart/@...n - Do you've any pointers please?
>>>
>>> It's very noticeable that although you seem to have isolated a bug in
>>> the power management subsystem (supplier goes into runtime suspend
>>> even when one of its consumers is still active), you did not CC the
>>> power management maintainer or mailing list.
>>>
>>> I have added the appropriate CC's.
>>
>> Thanks Alan!


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project