[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <383ff3ab-ef13-1c6e-7794-ecfffc6044d4@torproject.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:18:18 -0600
From: Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch: do_wait: make PIDTYPE_PID case O(1) instead of O(n)
Thanks for the quick review!
On 3/9/21 02:56, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I'd suggest to put this PIDTYPE_PID code into the new function.
Done
> No, you don't need rcu lock, tasklist_lock is sufficient
Done
> This is wrong, you forgot to drop tasklist_lock.
Done
>> + real_parent = !target->real_parent ? target->parent :
>> + target->real_parent;
>
> Hmm, I don't understand the line above... perhaps it connects to the
> question below.
I'd mistakenly thought `real_parent` was NULL if the target wasn't being
traced (or was being traced by the real parent). It looks like indeed
this should always be set, though.
> Afaics, parent/real_parent can't be NULL if pid_task() succeeds.
Done
> Please redo and send V2 ;)
Sent with subject "[PATCH v2] do_wait: make PIDTYPE_PID case O(1)
instead of O(n)"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists