linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdkfd: fix build error with AMD_IOMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8023bb6b-b6aa-230c-afa5-871ce32782c6@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:30:19 -0500
From:   Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:     Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdkfd: fix build error with AMD_IOMMU_V2=m

Am 2021-03-09 um 3:58 a.m. schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:23 AM Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com> wrote:
>> Using 'imply AMD_IOMMU_V2' does not guarantee that the driver can link
>> against the exported functions. If the GPU driver is built-in but the
>> IOMMU driver is a loadable module, the kfd_iommu.c file is indeed
>> built but does not work:
>>
>> x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_iommu.o: in function `kfd_iommu_bind_process_to_device':
>> kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0x516): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_bind_pasid'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_iommu.o: in function `kfd_iommu_unbind_process':
>> kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0x691): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_unbind_pasid'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_iommu.o: in function `kfd_iommu_suspend':
>> kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0x966): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0x97f): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_set_invalid_ppr_cb'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0x9a4): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_free_device'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_iommu.o: in function `kfd_iommu_resume':
>> kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xa9a): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_init_device'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xadc): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xaff): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_set_invalid_ppr_cb'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xc72): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_bind_pasid'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xe08): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xe26): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_set_invalid_ppr_cb'
>> x86_64-linux-ld: kfd_iommu.c:(.text+0xe42): undefined reference to `amd_iommu_free_device'
>>
>> Use IS_REACHABLE to only build IOMMU-V2 support if the amd_iommu symbols
>> are reachable by the amdkfd driver. Output a warning if they are not,
>> because that may not be what the user was expecting.
> This would fix the compile-time failure, but it still fails my CI
> because you introduce
> a compile-time warning. Can you change it into a runtime warning instead?

Sure.


>
> Neither type of warning is likely to actually reach the person trying
> to debug the
> problem, so you still end up with machines that don't do what they should,
> but I can live with the runtime warning as long as the build doesn't break.

OK.


>
> I think the proper fix would be to not rely on custom hooks into a particular
> IOMMU driver, but to instead ensure that the amdgpu driver can do everything
> it needs through the regular linux/iommu.h interfaces. I realize this
> is more work,
> but I wonder if you've tried that, and why it didn't work out.

As far as I know this hasn't been tried. I see that intel-iommu has its
own SVM thing, which seems to be similar to what our IOMMUv2 does. I
guess we'd have to abstract that into a common API.

Regards,
  Felix


>
>        Arnd