[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210309120519.7c6bbb97@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:05:19 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: The killing of ideal_nops[]
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:58:17 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAICT everything made in the past 10 years ends up using p6_nops. Is it
> time to kill off ideal_nops[] and simplify life?
>
Well, the one bug that was reported recently was due to a box that uses a
different "ideal_nops" than p6_nops. Perhaps we should ask him if there's
any noticeable difference between using p6_nops for every function than the
ideal_nops that as found for that box.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists