[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a712359c-4671-6f6e-13a1-2a9682a6ec08@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 20:12:53 +0200
From: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: Add slub_debug option to panic on memory
corruption
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for the comments!
On 3/9/21 16:56, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>
>> Being able to stop the system immediately when a memory corruption
>> is detected is crucial to finding the source of it. This is very
>> useful when the memory can be inspected with kdump or other tools.
>
> Hmmm.... ok.
The idea is to be able to collect data right after the corruption is
detected, otherwise more data might be corrupted and tracing becomes
more difficult.
>
>> static void restore_bytes(struct kmem_cache *s, char *message, u8 data,
>> void *from, void *to)
>> {
>> + if (slub_debug & SLAB_CORRUPTION_PANIC)
>> + panic("slab: object overwritten\n");
>> slab_fix(s, "Restoring 0x%p-0x%p=0x%x\n", from, to - 1, data);
>> memset(from, data, to - from);
>> }
>
> Why panic here? This should only be called late in the bug reporting when
> an error has already been printed.
This is called by both slab_pad_check() and check_bytes_and_report(), so it
seemed like a common place where i could put the panic(). I can move it to
the caller functions instead, if that's preferred.
Thanks,
Georgi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists