[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210309015950.27688-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:59:47 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: npiggin@...il.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, dave@...olabs.net
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/qspinlock: Some tuning updates
Hi,
A few updates while going through the powerpc port of the qspinlock.
Patches 1 and 2 are straightforward, while patch 3 can be considered
more of an rfc as I've only tested on a single machine, and there
could be an alternative way if it doesn't end up being nearly a
universal performance win.
Thanks!
Davidlohr Bueso (3):
powerpc/spinlock: Define smp_mb__after_spinlock only once
powerpc/spinlock: Unserialize spin_is_locked
powerpc/qspinlock: Use generic smp_cond_load_relaxed
arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h | 16 ----------------
arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 14 --------------
arch/powerpc/include/asm/simple_spinlock.h | 6 +-----
arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists