[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ_oJJem6sdEwTjLucjHF_R70Pa=C_c__v7x3QMz-WBAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 04:07:00 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: make STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK configurable.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:10 AM Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:22:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:35 PM Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > When using dummy-tools STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK is unconditionally
> > > > > selected. This defeats the purpose of the all-enabled tool.
> > > > >
> > > > > Description copied from arm
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could you explain what problem
> > > > this patch is trying to solve?
> > >
> > > The option cannot be disabled when compiler has the required capability.
> >
> >
> > Yes.
> > Currently, this symbol claims "def_bool y",
> > so there is no way to disable it.
> >
> > But, it comes from the nature of Kconfig in general.
> >
> > dummy-tools is completely unrelated here.
>
> dummy-tools makes all configuration options available in order to be
> able to author configuration files on system different from the one
> where the kernel is built. This prevents authoring a configuration file
> with this option disabled.
No.
dummy-tools enables as many $(cc-option, ...)
and $(shell, ...) as possible. That's it.
In my understanding, STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK
should not be user-configurable.
That is why 'def_bool y'.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists