linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] SPARC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:27:41 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        linux-sparc <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] SPARC

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:08 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> I'll make sure that gets into my next pull req, thanks.

Note that it's obviously always easiest for me to just ignore
something like sparc entirely, but on the other hand, particularly for
low-volume trees it's also ok to just say "I don't have anything
pending, here's the link to lore.kernel.org, can you apply that one
patch directly".

(And yes, I prefer lore.kernel.org over marc, although for single
patches it doesn't make much of a difference. For patch series, I find
'b4' so convenient that I definitely want the patch to show up on
lore.kernel.org).

I'll await your pull request or 'I have nothing else, take it from
xyz', this thread is otherwise archived for me as "done".

              Linus